TY  - JOUR
N2  - This study investigates metadiscourse as a central mechanism of academic legitimization in English and Uzbek research articles. The research examines how metadiscursive resources regulate argumentative organization, guide reader interpretation, and construct epistemic credibility across two distinct scholarly traditions. Drawing on a comparative discourse analytical framework, the study analyzes interactional and textual metadiscourse in selected research articles from humanities and social sciences disciplines.
The findings reveal that in English academic writing metadiscourse frequently functions through dialogic engagement, calibrated epistemic positioning, and explicit reader orientation. In contrast, Uzbek research articles demonstrate a stronger reliance on structural coherence, cumulative reasoning, and integrative generalization as mechanisms of legitimization. Despite these differences, both discourse traditions employ metadiscourse as a regulatory layer that aligns argumentative development with culturally embedded models of scholarly authority.
The study proposes a linguopragmatic model of academic legitimization in which metadiscourse mediates between argumentative structuring and epistemic evaluation. The findings contribute to cross linguistic discourse studies by clarifying how academic credibility is discursively constructed within different communicative frameworks.
AV  - none
A1  - Alijon kizi Kurbnova, Shokhidakhon
PB  - ?CENTER FOR ADVANCED STUDIES? LLC
TI  - METADISCOURSE AS A MECHANISM OF ACADEMIC LEGITIMIZATION IN ENGLISH AND UZBEK RESEARCH ARTICLES
KW  - metadiscourse
KW  -  academic legitimization
KW  -  research articles
KW  -  epistemic positioning
KW  -  academic discourse
KW  -  linguopragmatics
KW  -  cross linguistic analysis
KW  -  scholarly communication.
ID  - arxiv9831
JF  - SCIENCE TIME JOURNAL; Vol. 4 No. 5/1 (2026): ?ILM VAQTI? (SCIENCE TIME) jurnali; 37-44
Y1  - 2026/05/04/
UR  - https://uzresearchers.com/index.php/stj/article/view/5834
ER  -