COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF DRIP IRRIGATION AND CONVENTIONAL IRRIGATION METHODS: A SYNTHESIS OF RECENT RESEARCHBekjanovNursultan BaxitjanovichauthorAkmalovShamshodbek BaxtiyarovichauthorIncreasing water scarcity and rising food demand require more efficient irrigation strategies in agriculture. This study synthesizes recent research comparing drip irrigation and conventional irrigation methods, including flood, furrow, and sprinkler systems, with a focus on water use efficiency (WUE), crop yield, economic performance, and environmental impacts. Evidence from meta-analyses and field experiments indicates that drip irrigation can reduce water consumption by 30–50% compared to traditional surface irrigation methods, primarily due to minimized evaporation and runoff losses. In many horticultural and high-value crop systems, dripirrigation also improves water productivity and frequently results in equal or higher yields through precise root-zone moisture management and fertigation practices. However, economic outcomes vary depending on crop type, scale, and regional waterpricing. While drip systems require higher initial investment and technical maintenance, long-term benefits often include reduced labor, optimized fertilizer use, and improved crop quality. Environmental assessments further show that drip irrigation can decrease soil erosion and nutrient leaching, though localized salinity risks may occur if systems are poorly managed. Overall, recent research supports drip irrigation as a sustainable and resource-efficient alternative to conventional irrigation, particularly in water-limited regions, provided that proper design, management, and economic planning are ensured.2026-04-15ConferencesArticle