Arxiv AcademicsEKVIVALENTLIK HÁM ADEKVATLIQ: ZAMANAGÓY AWDARMA TEORIYASINDAǴI ORNIAtashovaF.DauthorEsemuratovaA.EauthorThe article explores the concept of “equivalence” as a core notion in translation theory. Although often used interchangeably with “adequacy,” the two are not identical. The study highlights how the term “adequate translation,” introduced by I.I. Revzin and V.Y. Rosenstein in the 1960s, was associated with the idea of complete transfer of meaning and function. Later views, including those of A.V. Fedorov and L.K. Latyshev, emphasized the complexity of defining equivalence and its relation to adequacy. The paper also discusses W. Koller’s typology of equivalence, which includes denotative, connotative, text-normative, pragmatic, and formal-aesthetic types. The conclusion stresses that equivalence remains a key yet contested category in translation studies and must be distinguished from adequacy. 2025-12-11ConferencesArticle

For work being deposited by its own author: In self-archiving this collection of files and associated bibliographic metadata, I grant Arxiv Academics the right to store them and to make them permanently available publicly for free on-line. I declare that this material is my own intellectual property and I understand that Arxiv Academics does not assume any responsibility if there is any breach of copyright in distributing these files or metadata. (All authors are urged to prominently assert their copyright on the title page of their work.)

For work being deposited by someone other than its author: I hereby declare that the collection of files and associated bibliographic metadata that I am archiving at Arxiv Academics is in the public domain. If this is not the case, I accept full responsibility for any breach of copyright that distributing these files or metadata may entail.

Clicking on the Deposit Item Now button indicates your agreement to these terms.