https://arxiv.academicsbook.com/id/eprint/4438 2026-05-29T10:42:16Z info:eu-repo/semantics/descriptiveMetadata https://arxiv.academicsbook.com/id/eprint/4438/ EKVIVALENTLIK HÁM ADEKVATLIQ: ZAMANAGÓY AWDARMA TEORIYASINDAǴI ORNI F.D, Atashova A.E, Esemuratova The article explores the concept of “equivalence” as a core notion in translation theory. Although often used interchangeably with “adequacy,” the two are not identical. The study highlights how the term “adequate translation,” introduced by I.I. Revzin and V.Y. Rosenstein in the 1960s, was associated with the idea of complete transfer of meaning and function. Later views, including those of A.V. Fedorov and L.K. Latyshev, emphasized the complexity of defining equivalence and its relation to adequacy. The paper also discusses W. Koller’s typology of equivalence, which includes denotative, connotative, text-normative, pragmatic, and formal-aesthetic types. The conclusion stresses that equivalence remains a key yet contested category in translation studies and must be distinguished from adequacy.  Conferences 2025-12-11 Article NonPeerReviewed F.D, Atashova and A.E, Esemuratova (2025) EKVIVALENTLIK HÁM ADEKVATLIQ: ZAMANAGÓY AWDARMA TEORIYASINDAǴI ORNI. Conferences; Vol. 1 No. 5 (2025): «Zamanagóy til biliminiń kommunikativ – pragmatikalıq máselelri hám shet tillerin oqıtıwdıń innovaciyalıq usılları» atamasındaǵı Xalıqaralıq ilimiy-ámeliy konferenciya ; 133-135. https://xiuresearch.com/index.php/Conferences/article/view/464 info:eu-repo/semantics/humanStartPage