Arxiv AcademicsPEJORATIVE EVALUATION IN POLITICAL LEADERS’ SPEECH: IRONY AND SARCASM AS SEMANTIC STRATEGIESSabinaNuraliyevaauthorPejorative evaluation is a hallmark of modern political rhetoric, functioning to delegitimize opponents, consolidate in-group identity, and draw ideological boundaries. Framed within hybrid semantics and pragmatics, this article foregrounds irony and sarcasm as central strategies that convert descriptive content into negative evaluative force. We outline the semantic mechanism of pragmaticalization, emphasize the contextual plasticity of pejoratives, and discuss the rhetorical utility of humorous derision in political communication. The analysis highlights the regulative, image-shaping, and audience-alignment functions of irony and sarcasm and argues for an integrated semantic-pragmatic approach to evaluative language in political discourse. 2025-12-12ConferencesArticle

For work being deposited by its own author: In self-archiving this collection of files and associated bibliographic metadata, I grant Arxiv Academics the right to store them and to make them permanently available publicly for free on-line. I declare that this material is my own intellectual property and I understand that Arxiv Academics does not assume any responsibility if there is any breach of copyright in distributing these files or metadata. (All authors are urged to prominently assert their copyright on the title page of their work.)

For work being deposited by someone other than its author: I hereby declare that the collection of files and associated bibliographic metadata that I am archiving at Arxiv Academics is in the public domain. If this is not the case, I accept full responsibility for any breach of copyright that distributing these files or metadata may entail.

Clicking on the Deposit Item Now button indicates your agreement to these terms.