<mods:mods version="3.3" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-3.xsd" xmlns:mods="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"><mods:titleInfo><mods:title>CONCEPTUALIZATION AND THE CONCEPTUAL FIELD IN  LINGUOCULTURAL RESEARCH</mods:title></mods:titleInfo><mods:name type="personal"><mods:namePart type="given">Mukhammadiyarov Aydos</mods:namePart><mods:namePart type="family">Joldasbaevich</mods:namePart><mods:role><mods:roleTerm type="text">author</mods:roleTerm></mods:role></mods:name><mods:abstract>This article explores the theoretical foundations of conceptual field analysis in linguocultural studies. It examines key definitions and approaches, drawing upon the work of prominent scholars such as Kubryakova, Ashurova &amp;amp; Galieva, Langacker, and Keesing. The analysis encompasses the study of concepts organized by shared features, the construction of cognitive maps, and the role of metaphorical conceptualization in revealing national-cultural and general mental characteristics. The article identifies key elements of the conceptual field, including non-equivalent lexicon, culturally specific phraseology, stylistic devices that characterize culture, mythologemes, and culturally specific concepts. It emphasizes the interconnectedness of linguistic elements and their function in conveying meaning, highlighting the importance of both grammatical and metaphorical analysis for understanding the cognitive underpinnings of language and culture. Finally, the study notes the hierarchical structure of metaphorical equivalence, progressing from general to specific, within conceptual fields.</mods:abstract><mods:originInfo><mods:dateIssued encoding="iso8601">2025-04-14</mods:dateIssued></mods:originInfo><mods:originInfo><mods:publisher>Hamkor konferensiyalar</mods:publisher></mods:originInfo><mods:genre>Article</mods:genre></mods:mods>