<mods:mods version="3.3" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-3.xsd" xmlns:mods="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"><mods:titleInfo><mods:title>INTEGRATING THE WATSON-GLASER APPRAISAL AND PEARSON’S R.E.D. MODEL TO ASSESS PHILOLOGY STUDENTS’ CRITICAL THINKING</mods:title></mods:titleInfo><mods:name type="personal"><mods:namePart type="given">Rakhmonova Munirabonu G‘ulomjon</mods:namePart><mods:namePart type="family">qizi</mods:namePart><mods:role><mods:roleTerm type="text">author</mods:roleTerm></mods:role></mods:name><mods:abstract>Critical thinking is an essential cognitive skill that enables students to analyze, interpret, and evaluate information effectively. Critical thinking plays a vital role in the field of philology since students engage deeply with linguistic structures, literary texts, and discourse analysis. The Watson-Glaser Critical Thinking Appraisal (WGCTA) is a widely recognized tool for measuring critical thinking skills through structured assessments. Pearson’s R.E.D. Model (Recognize Assumptions, Evaluate Arguments, Draw Conclusions) provides a practical framework for developing and assessing critical thinking abilities.&amp;nbsp; Integrating the WGCTA with the R.E.D. Model offers a comprehensive approach to evaluating and enhancing philology students’ critical thinking competencies. This study explores the effectiveness of this integration in assessing students’ analytical abilities and fostering deeper cognitive engagement.</mods:abstract><mods:originInfo><mods:dateIssued encoding="iso8601">2025-04-12</mods:dateIssued></mods:originInfo><mods:originInfo><mods:publisher>Hamkor konferensiyalar</mods:publisher></mods:originInfo><mods:genre>Article</mods:genre></mods:mods>