<mods:mods version="3.3" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-3.xsd" xmlns:mods="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"><mods:titleInfo><mods:title>DEFINITION OF MYTH, ITS ORIGIN, FUNCTIONS, AND TYPES</mods:title></mods:titleInfo><mods:name type="personal"><mods:namePart type="given"></mods:namePart><mods:namePart type="family">G.Djoldasova</mods:namePart><mods:role><mods:roleTerm type="text">author</mods:roleTerm></mods:role></mods:name><mods:name type="personal"><mods:namePart type="given"></mods:namePart><mods:namePart type="family">N.Amangeldieva</mods:namePart><mods:role><mods:roleTerm type="text">author</mods:roleTerm></mods:role></mods:name><mods:abstract>Following contemporary trends, we do not underestimate the significance of the objects with which we seek to surround ourselves. For modern humans, it remains crucial not only to form an aesthetic perception through the objects with which we interact, but also to preserve the need to feel the significance of those things that surround us. This natural desire to express our formed aesthetic ideals and beliefs through the forms we interact with constantly persists.</mods:abstract><mods:originInfo><mods:dateIssued encoding="iso8601">2024-11-30</mods:dateIssued></mods:originInfo><mods:originInfo><mods:publisher>Hamkor konferensiyalar</mods:publisher></mods:originInfo><mods:genre>Article</mods:genre></mods:mods>