<mets:mets OBJID="eprint_10102" LABEL="Eprints Item" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/METS/ http://www.loc.gov/standards/mets/mets.xsd http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-3.xsd" xmlns:mets="http://www.loc.gov/METS/" xmlns:mods="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"><mets:metsHdr CREATEDATE="2026-06-03T12:13:41Z"><mets:agent ROLE="CUSTODIAN" TYPE="ORGANIZATION"><mets:name>Arxiv Academics</mets:name></mets:agent></mets:metsHdr><mets:dmdSec ID="DMD_eprint_10102_mods"><mets:mdWrap MDTYPE="MODS"><mets:xmlData><mods:titleInfo><mods:title>COMPARATIVE STUDY OF TEACHING APPROACHES</mods:title></mods:titleInfo><mods:name type="personal"><mods:namePart type="given">Vafaeva</mods:namePart><mods:namePart type="family">Zarina Khashimovna</mods:namePart><mods:role><mods:roleTerm type="text">author</mods:roleTerm></mods:role></mods:name><mods:abstract>The debate between teacher-centered and student-centered approaches has become one of the most significant issues in modern education. Traditional teacher-centered instruction emphasizes the authority of the teacher, structured lessons, and knowledge transmission, whereas student-centered learning focuses on learners’ autonomy, active participation, and critical thinking. This article compares these two educational approaches by examining their characteristics, advantages, disadvantages, and influence on students’ academic performance and motivation. Using qualitative analysis of educational literature and classroom practices, the study highlights the strengths and limitations of both methods.</mods:abstract><mods:originInfo><mods:dateIssued encoding="iso8601">2026-05-10</mods:dateIssued></mods:originInfo><mods:originInfo><mods:publisher>“CENTER FOR ADVANCED STUDIES” LLC</mods:publisher></mods:originInfo><mods:genre>Article</mods:genre></mets:xmlData></mets:mdWrap></mets:dmdSec><mets:amdSec ID="TMD_eprint_10102"><mets:rightsMD ID="rights_eprint_10102_mods"><mets:mdWrap MDTYPE="MODS"><mets:xmlData><mods:useAndReproduction>
<p xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><strong>For work being deposited by its own author:</strong>
In self-archiving this collection of files and associated bibliographic
metadata, I grant Arxiv Academics the right to store
them and to make them permanently available publicly for free on-line.
I declare that this material is my own intellectual property and I
understand that Arxiv Academics does not assume any
responsibility if there is any breach of copyright in distributing these
files or metadata. (All authors are urged to prominently assert their
copyright on the title page of their work.)</p>

<p xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><strong>For work being deposited by someone other than its
author:</strong> I hereby declare that the collection of files and
associated bibliographic metadata that I am archiving at
Arxiv Academics is in the public domain. If this is
not the case, I accept full responsibility for any breach of copyright
that distributing these files or metadata may entail.</p>

<p xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">Clicking on the <em>Deposit Item Now</em> button indicates your agreement to these
terms.</p>
    </mods:useAndReproduction></mets:xmlData></mets:mdWrap></mets:rightsMD></mets:amdSec><mets:fileSec></mets:fileSec><mets:structMap><mets:div DMDID="DMD_eprint_10102_mods" ADMID="TMD_eprint_10102"></mets:div></mets:structMap></mets:mets>